Order your ARC 2012-2013 Salon Catalogue

Click here to become a sponsor

   
Nymphs and Satyr, by William Bouguereau (Detail)
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to see upcoming exhibition information Click to visit the Living Masters Gallery Click to see the winners of the 2011-2012 ARC Salon click to see the winners of the 2012 ARC Scholarship

Categories
  • [1 post]
    •
  • Academia and Modernism [26 posts]
    •
  • Advice to Artists [16 posts]
    •
  • Aesthetics [55 posts]
    •
  • ARC Living Master Gallery Testimonials [6 posts]
    •
  • Architecture [1 post]
    •
  • Art and Politics [13 posts]
    •
  • Art as a Profession [1 post]
    •
  • Art Criticism [9 posts]
    •
  • Art History Anecdotes [5 posts]
    •
  • Art History Timeline [3 posts]
    •
  • Art Practice [9 posts]
    •
  • Art's Place in Society [27 posts]
    •
  • Artspeak 101 [6 posts]
    •
  • Ateliers [10 posts]
    •
  • Bad Philosophy [1 post]
    •
  • Book Reviews [1 post]
    •
  • Canvas Priming or Preparation [1 post]
    •
  • College Activism: Return to Realism [52 posts]
    •
  • College Curricula [9 posts]
    •
  • Commentary on Specific Artists [33 posts]
    •
  • Definitions of Art [8 posts]
    •
  • Digital Art [20 posts]
    •
  • Discussion: William Bouguereau [3 posts]
    •
  • Exhibitions [5 posts]
    •
  • Fine Art and Photography [4 posts]
    •
  • Freedom of Expression [6 posts]
    •
  • Frequently Asked Questions [30 posts]
    •
  • Funding for the Arts [1 post]
    •
  • Good Art Versus Traditionalism [1 post]
    •
  • Hockney Completely Refuted [53 posts]
    •
  • Illustration as a Fine Art [27 posts]
    •
  • Impressionism vs Academism [5 posts]
    •
  • Juries and Competitions [1 post]
    •
  • Letters to ARC [458 posts]
    •
  • Life of an Artist [7 posts]
    •
  • Modernist Heroes Reconsidered [62 posts]
    •
  • Modernist Orthodoxy on Campus [4 posts]
    •
  • Moral Relativism [1 post]
    •
  • Music and Art [1 post]
    •
  • Myth & Religion in Art [7 posts]
    •
  • Nudity [1 post]
    •
  • Paint Pigments [8 posts]
    •
  • Perspective [2 posts]
    •
  • Picasso: Discussion by experts [14 posts]
    •
  • Places to See [1 post]
    •
  • Post of the Week [2 posts]
    •
  • Realism on the Rise [2 posts]
    •
  • Regarding GoodArt and ARC [10 posts]
    •
  • Renaissance Art [1 post]
    •
  • Responses to ARC [4 posts]
    •
  • Scholarship [1 post]
    •
  • Sculpture [1 post]
    •
  • Setting up the Studio [6 posts]
    •
  • Students at non-ARC Approved schools [1 post]
    •
  • Technical questions discussed and answered [6 posts]
    •
  • Techniques: Art Manuals [1 post]
    •
  • Techniques: Draughtsmanship [33 posts]
    •
  • Techniques: Oil Painting [80 posts]
    •
  • Techniques: Sculpture [2 posts]
    •
  • The Case of Pete Panse [4 posts]
    •
  • The Marketplace [19 posts]
    •
  • The Origins of Modernism [6 posts]
    •
  • What is Art? [24 posts]
    •


    Hollow talk

    by Virgil Elliott

    Piet Spijkers wrote:
    Virgil,

    The question you asked was: name me one positive comment which is not "hollow talk". There it was. Evan talked, with reasons, about an "indisputable giant" - with arguments you may agree with or not.

    But that was not the point here, (your being in agreement or not). I also like Pavarotti´s voice very much.
    Piet,

    By the same standard you use to label the negative comments regarding Cézanne "hollow talk," i.e., your personal judgment, I likewise regard laudatory comments regarding his work in the same light, by the standards of my own judgment, substantiated by the absence of visual evidence of mastery in the paintings in question vis-à-vis the works of many actual masters of the art of painting. Can you really justify proclaiming Cézanne an "indisputable giant" if you recognize Rembrandt, Vermeer, Velasquez, Rubens, etc. as examples of indisputable giants? Cézanne is certainly disputable as deserving of that status. I and many others are disputing it; therefore it is not indisputable. Who disputes Rembrandt's worthiness?

    Virgil





    Home